When people hear the term “indecent exposure” it probably conjures images of a flasher in a trench coat or an inebriated college student streaking at a football game. You probably don’t think it’s an offense everyday people need to worry about. While, it is not the most severe sexual offense, misunderstandings are all too common, and ordinary citizens find themselves in compromising and serious legal trouble every day.
At The Law Offices of Morgan Fletcher Benfield, PLLC, we realize that an indecent exposure charge can be very hard to explain and is often the first time people encounter the criminal justice system. We know it can be embarrassing and your first instinct may be to simply get the process over with as soon as possible, but the worst thing you can do is underestimate your situation. The full impact of a conviction can be harsh and long-lasting. By working with a knowledgeable indecent exposure lawyer, you can avoid the pitfalls and effectively handle the matter with the utmost sensitivity.
Call Tacoma sex crimes lawyer Morgan Fletcher Benfield today at (253) 518-3643 to schedule a free and confidential consultation.
Understanding Indecent Exposure in Washington State
According to RCW 9A.88.010(1), a person commits indecent exposure if they intentionally expose themselves or another person to someone in an open and obscene manner, knowing that their behavior is likely to cause a reasonable affront or alarm. When indecency is being discussed, it typically revolves around a person revealing his or her private parts in a public space, but a lot will depend on the circumstances involved and the specific elements of the statute:- The act must be intentional. Specifically, it needs to result from a conscious effort. If you jump into a swimming pool and the water forces your baiting suit off, this cannot be considered willful.
- There must be legitimate exposure. This refers to the area and degree in which a private area was revealed. If someone only glimpsed your underwear as you adjust your waistband, this would not constitute exposure.
- The exposure needs to be open and obscene. This element can be confusing, since nudity on its own does not necessarily rise to this level. For instance, public breastfeeding does not meet the condition, probably because the legislature does not find that openly showing breasts for the purposes of feeding a child as obscene.
- The act must be likely to cause alarm or affront. It can certainly be difficult to gauge what will offend another person; however, this element is met when you are aware that your conduct will reasonably cause offense. Essentially, a prosecutor will need to prove that you were aware that your open and obscene exposure was likely to cause alarm. It does not have to be your intent – just that it was likely. For instance, if you participated in a nude marathon for charity, you probably won’t face charges because the people in attendance are not likely to be alarmed. They undoubtedly expected it. However, if you decide to run naked through a farmer’s market, it would be feasible that other people would be alarmed by a naked person, surprisingly running past them.